Book Review: Know The Creeds And Councils

Know The Creeds And Councils, by Justin S. Holcomb

[Note: This book has been provided free of charge by BookLook/Zondervan Press in exchange for an honest review.]

In many ways, this book has a lot of overlap with the author’s previous book, Know The Heretics [1], in that as the author defines heresies based largely on the Nicean (and to a lesser extent Athenasian and Chalcedonian) Creeds, it only seems natural for the author to then tackle the problem from the other side, in looking at the content and value of those creeds and the very painfully human councils that formed them. At least with regards to the first half of the book or so (aside from the excellent and short Apostle’s Creed), there is a substantial overlap as this part of the book recapitulates his previous arguments.

Where this book is unique and distinctive (and, like its predecessor, a worthy read), is in its discussion about the Apostles’ Creed (which shows some evidence of some early Hellenizing tendencies but is, in the main, an entirely acceptable and very brief creed, although the author does not believe that holding to the Apostles’ Creed is enough to make one a Christian, as it does not have a strong enough insistence on the Trinity to suit the author, and this author talks a lot about the Trinity as well as predestination, where the author appears to take a somewhat strong Calvinist position, to the point of considering Arminians to be heterodox or even semi-Pelagian [2]). As before, the author attempts to be fair-minded in pointing out the political nature of creeds, shows a strong ecumenical tendency (even to the point of giving high praise to the Trent and Vatican II Councils, both of which are included in this work, as are the Heidelberg Confession and the Westminister Confession of Faith, which the author praises greatly for their importance to Reformed believers).

With some notable exceptions (namely the author’s support of the statement of the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy), it would appear as if the author of this book mainly subscribes to the idea that within certain clear boundaries (Sunday observance, belief in the Trinity), that a progressive revelation approach building on traditions and staying within certain lines and emphasizing complexity (even to the point of seeming contradiction) as opposed to seeing straightforward and simple answers as the best way to ensure orthodoxy for believers. The author shows himself, as before, mostly broad-minded, even willing to concede cases where people (like the so-called Semi-Pelagians who did not believe in original sin but did not believe that salvation could be earned, or the so-called semi-Arians who did not believe that Jesus Christ was a created being but also did not believe in the Trinity but rather believed that the Holy Spirit was a power or a force, as is written in the scriptures) were given loaded and inappropriate names, even if the author still views them as at best heterodox, if not outright heretical, considering the view of “orthodox” Christians to these believers as being one of compassionate orthodoxy, seeking a broad-minded consensus but still drawing lines where the author believes it is necessary.

Again, there is much that I disagree with concerning this book, whether one looks at the pro-Catholic ecumenical movement this book appears to promote, or whether one looks at beliefs on the relative value of tradition as opposed to scripture, or the alleged (but unproven) use of the apocrypha by early Christians whose use of the Septuagint does not appear to have included any of the books added to the Catholic Bible at the Council of Trent. That said, this is the sort of book that provides a great deal of insight into the way that mainstream Christianity defines itself, and how it seeks to legitimize its history and make use of its traditions. Even if one can see a clear falloff from the rule of faith transmitted by the Apostles to the growing authoritarianism that led to a decline in the understanding of the doctrine of resurrections and the Family of God and the import of heathen ideas like the immortality of the soul and the use of Greek philosophy to explain the truths of scripture, all of which must be counted as a falling away from the truth once delivered, it is notable that the author struggles honestly with the history and seeks to bolster what he sees as contemporary upswing in interest in the so-called Apostolic Fathers, many of whom were active in the Hellenization of Christianity that this particular author views as the only legitimate Christianity.

Before I close, I would like to make one particularly notable praise of the author in his clear description of the course of Christian thought from the apparently unwritten “Rule of Faith,” which opened the door to heathen innovations in Christianity to very formal creeds during the early Middle Ages, to confessions and catechisms later on, each of them getting further and further away from the well-spring of biblical truth and ever more shrouded in human interpretation. This tendency is described honestly by the author, and it helps us to figure out why it is that so little is known today about genuine and original Christianity by so many, because of the drift away from the Bible over the centuries. For honestly detailing that drift from the point of view of those who drifted with the flow, this is an interesting work with a lot of thought-provoking statements.


[2] See, for example:

About nathanalbright

I'm a person with diverse interests who loves to read. If you want to know something about me, just ask.
This entry was posted in Book Reviews, Christianity, Church of God, History and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Book Review: Know The Creeds And Councils

  1. Pingback: | Book Review: Know The Creeds And Councils | Edge Induced …

  2. Pingback: Book Review: The Trial Of Jesus From A Lawyer’s Standpoint, Volume 1 | Edge Induced Cohesion

  3. Pingback: Book Review: The Presence | Edge Induced Cohesion


    Is repentance a necessary act that is required by men for salvation or are men saved by “faith only?”

    Acts 17:30-31 Therefore having overlooked the times of ignorance, God is now declaring to men that all people everywhere should repent, 31 because He has fixed a day in which He will judge the world in righteousness through a Man whom He has appointed, having furnished proof to all men by raising Him from the dead.

    People should repent because God commanded it and because all men will stand before Jesus on Judgment Day.

    Luke 24:47 and that repentance for the forgiveness of sins would be proclaimed in His name to all the nations, beginning from Jerusalem.

    People should repent for the forgiveness of their sins. On the Day of Pentecost, in Jerusalem, men were required to repent in order to have their sins forgiven. They needed to make the commitment to turn from sin and turn toward God. Yes, they needed to repent in order to be saved. (Acts 2:38)

    Romans 2:5 But because of your stubbornness and unrepentant heart you are storing up wrath for yourself in the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God.

    Men need to repent in order to not experience the wrath of God. A stubborn and unrepentant heart can make men reluctant to believe what Jesus said “and has been baptized shall be saved.” (Mark 16:16) Shall be saved; follows water baptism and belief.

    2 Corinthians 7:10 For the sorrow that is according to the will of God produces a repentance without regret, leading to salvation, but the sorrow of the world produces death.

    People should repent because it leads to salvation.

    2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slow about His promise, but is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish but for all to come to repentance.

    All people should repent in order not to perish. Contrary to Calvinist teaching God wants all men to repent.

    Luke 13:2-3 And Jesus said to them, “Do you suppose that these Galileans were greater sinners than all other Galileans because they suffered this fate? 3 I tell you, no, but unless you repent, you will likewise perish.

    People should repent because Jesus said “repent or perish.”

    Acts 2:38 Peter said to them, “Repent, and each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

    All men should repent so that they can have their sins forgiven and receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

    It men believe (John 3:16), confess (Romans 10:9-10), repent (Acts 3:19) and are baptized in water (Acts 2:38) then they are saved. It can take 2 hrs more or less.

    Repentance does not stop at water baptism. You also need to repent after you become a Christian.


    Galatians 5:19-21 Now the deeds of the flesh are evident, which are: immorality, impurity, sensuality, 20 idolatry, sorcery, enmities, strife, jealousy, outbursts of anger, disputes, dissensions, factions, 21 envying, drunkenness, carousing, and things like these, of which I forewarn you, just as I have forewarned you, that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.



  5. Pingback: Book Review: Exploring Christian Theology: Volume Two | Edge Induced Cohesion

  6. Pingback: Book Review: What Christians Ought To Believe | Edge Induced Cohesion

  7. Pingback: The Rhetoric Of Religious Dissent | Edge Induced Cohesion

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s