Between A Rock And A Hard Place: The Fate Of Ousted Dictators And Divided Nations

The sight of loony and oppressive former Libyan Dictator Gaddafi ought to be a cautionary tale for other dictators in the region. Gaddafi, like Barre in Somalia, sought to hold together his oppressive rule, which had been supported (or at least tolerated) by other nations (not least other African nations, as well as world powers) because Libya (like Somalia, Iraq, and plenty of other nations around the world) appears to lack sufficient asabiya to hold itself together in the absence of a strong dictator. If you want to force people together who do not want to be together, you have to do so by coercion rather than those means that freedom loving Westerners like myself generally find acceptable. And yet I support the Union’s successful destruction of the rebel separatist regime, which would (correctly) suggest that my support of separatist movements is not automatic.

Nonetheless, Libya is at a crossroads, and it also presents a very ugly scenario for a couple of other dictators in the region (namely the current dictators of Syria and Yemen). Yemen’s dictator has already had to take a leave of absence from Yemen to Saudi Arabia because of health concerns, and the sight of a fellow strongman being killed, dragged through the streets of his hometown, and generally shamed ought to be giving him nightmares in his sleep. I doubt the Yemeni rebels would do anything more respectful with his corpse than the Libyan rebels did, nor do I doubt that Yemen itself has some major separatist problems (most notably the omnipresent threat of Aden to separate from Northern Yemen in the absence of firm leadership on the part of the north).

The same is true of Syria. Syria’s leadership by a small Baathist minority spearheaded by the small Alawai minority and opposed by both Kurdish separatists as well as the Sunni majority puts Bashir Assad, a dynastic dictator, in a dangerous position. Knowing he is in a minority and unwilling to face trial like former Egyptian Hosni Mubarak, Assad has risked international hostility from NATO forces by opening a bloodbath on his own restive population. Now that President Obama and his NATO allies are about to declare ‘mission accomplished’ in Libya, it is not inconvenient for those same forces to now turn their attention to Syria, which is a short cruise on the Mediterranean from the shores of Tripoli. If I were Mr. Assad, I would not want to encourage them to make the cruise and practice their gunnery against my palaces and installations in order to prop up some bogus and weak Transitional National Government and further the spread of Islamism in the Middle East, with all that means for minority peoples like Christians in the area.

Nor is Libya necessarily going to be a lot better of a place now that Gaddafi has received his just desserts and is now taking a sandnap. After all, Libya itself has a strong threat to facing Somalification. To wit, the region that spearheaded the initial uprising against Gaddafi is a region with strong separatist tendencies. Just as Somaliland started the hostility to Barre’s regime in the ongoing Somali civil war, and has been free (and unrecognized) since then, so the region of Cyrenaica spearheaded the initial insurrection against Gaddafi. And there are plenty of dangerous cross-currents. Could resurgent Islamists behave like Al-Shabab in Somalia? It’s certainly possible. Will neighboring nations like Egypt and even faraway powers like Qatar, to say nothing of European nations like Italy, seek to bolster parties to ensure access to Libya’s natural resources or to prefer a weak and divided Libya to a powerful one? Almost certainly. Is Libya’s explosive mixture of Tripoli, Cyrenaica, and the mostly Berber-Tuareg Fezzan a basketcase just waiting for an ugly partition with fights over the distribution of wealth from Libya’s natural resources? It would appear so from this somewhat jaded observer.

The end result is that Libya is in a very delicate situation, with a weak transitional government, a lot of competiting (and possibly incompatible) visions for the future, and the strong potential of exporting its problems to other nations. And like the Kurds of northern Iraq, the cultural and ethnic tensions within Libya have plenty of dangers for other nations nearby as well, as has already been discussed here. The Somalification of Libya is a very real possibility unless a regime can achieve power fairly quickly as well as a broad-based legitimacy. This appears unlikely, so the realistic best-case scenario is some kind of fairly weak coalition government with a substantial amount of devolution to Libya’s regions. In short, this situation looks like Belgium [1] and Iraq [2] all over again, unless someone is able to become the next strongman, in which case we will have Gaddafi 2.0.

These are not pleasant options, but this is the reality of nations like Libya (as well as Syria and Yemen and many others). Where sufficient social cohesion is lacking to form a legitimate and broadly supported civil government, the options left available shrink to the poles of anarchy (partition, separation, and division), and tyranny. Where tyranny is opposed by the force of arms in support of some dubious desire to spread democracy where the soil appears unready, the result is anarchy and civil unrest. Before we topple tyrants we need to do a much better job of understanding the reality of the societies they rule.

Tyrants exist not because governments are too strong, but because the alternatives of civilian government are often seen as too weak. They are a sign of insecurity and weakness within ruling elites, not of the strength they often wish to project through the world through powerful militaries and decisive leaders. The fact that many nations have struggled with dictators in recent decades suggests that most states in the world are weak and terribly divided, and lacking in legitimacy. How to form, or encourage the formation, of legitimate governments where they are lacking is a daunting task, requiring nearly supernatural insight and nearly omnipotent power. I am not optimistic on the prospects of trying to keep nations like Libya and Iraq together, and if Syria and Yemen (and others) join them, then we are like Dr. Frankenstein trying to patch together a body politic out of corpses from a cemetery, and just as likely to create a horrible monster. Is that what we want?

[1] https://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com/2011/02/21/who-needs-government-anyway-belgium-doesnt/

[2] https://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com/2011/03/23/libya-ira-and-the-perils-of-partition/

About nathanalbright

I'm a person with diverse interests who loves to read. If you want to know something about me, just ask.
This entry was posted in International Relations, Middle East, Musings, Somaliland and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Between A Rock And A Hard Place: The Fate Of Ousted Dictators And Divided Nations

  1. Joe says:

    You certanly do have a flair for descriptive words, I love “sandnap”, lol

    Although you do make some very good points I cannot add commentary or a reply as I am not as informed politically as you are. Just the same I do love reading your blogs. Keep up the good work.

  2. Joe says:

    Perfect reasoning, shows your on the ball, lol. I also favored “Gaddafi 2.0.”, too funny. Sad that people must die, evil or not everyone has opportunity for redemption and sadder that some do not take it. Still funny tho. MGFM. 😀

    • Yes, being part of the generation I am the 2.0 bit came rather easily as well. Repentance and mercy are always preferable to judgment, but some do not take the opportunity for mercy. Vengeance is a slippery emotion to indulge in, because it encourages us to remain in our anger and makes peace all that more difficult to obtain, because then more people have grudges to avenge and even less encouragement to be reasonable.

  3. Richard says:

    After thinking about this blog more, I realize now something more behind accepting Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour. When a person can accept that another man (Jesus the man) can be greater than ones own self, there is a humbling and a realization that it is not you personally that is the one to “save the world” as we are merely human beings and not of divine nature as is Christ.
    There is a danger in thinking that there is none greater than the self as can be seen throughout history by the dictators and madd-men whom have tread on the hearts and minds and liberties of people the world over.

    • One of the grave problems with the situation of the world (and this is true for American politics as well) is the expectation that a man can be a political savior, whether he is Obama or someone else on the other side. In reality, accepting Jesus Christ as a savior means more than just spiritual saving, but also means that we refuse and deny the claims of government or politicians to save us from the problems that we face either.

  4. Richard says:

    There is none too great. In nature; when the plant rises to the surface, the earth forgives and moves to the side agreeing that life make its entry, and when the water flows, what does not forgive gets tossed about and washed away, water never seeks the path of least resistence, it simply and quietly makes its own way towards life, and nothing strong can pevent it from flowing.

    This is not gnostism, philosophy, religion, politics, science, poetry, eco friendly or utopian idealism, it is merely an observance of nature, and something not recognized in our own humanity.

    • The willow bends with the wind, and the oak gets broken. There is much we can learn from the world around us if we are astute learners, but most of us fail to learn as we should because instead of looking and taking note we look thinking we already know, and therefore we do not notice what the world around us is telling us.

  5. Richard says:

    Ah, your Cree is showing.

    And I agree with you that many people fail to see the similarities in nature and what we can learn from them. Like many things that have been labled, a person who talks about such things is merely tossed off as a “tree hugger” or a “nature child”, laughed at, sometimes ridiculed and mostly ignored. Oh well.

    And in the streets: the children screamed,
    The lovers cried, and the poets dreamed.
    But not a word was spoken;
    The church bells all were broken.
    And the three men I admire most:
    The father, son, and the holy ghost,
    They caught the last train for the coast
    The day the music died.

    • I was not aware that was a Cree tale, but I have the blood of at least a couple of Native American tribes flowing through me (the Blackfeet and perhaps the Seminole on my mother’s side and the Cherokee on my father’s side). I do not believe that we should worship nature, but rather that creation reveals the moral and intellectual attributes of our Creator, and so by knowing creation we know and understand how our Creator operates, and can properly honor and respect and obey Him, in the manner of Paul’s message to the Romans. Nonetheless, people cannot easily distinguish between one and the other.

  6. Pingback: Book Review: A Mad Catastrophe | Edge Induced Cohesion

  7. Pingback: The Most Awkward Missionary Of All Time | Edge Induced Cohesion

  8. Pingback: Qatar And The Perils Of Edge Induced Cohesion | Edge Induced Cohesion

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s