Monthly Archives: September 2026

Sorting Without Sufficient Evidence: The Structural Failure of Team Evaluation in NCAA FBS Football: A White Paper

Executive Summary Every competitive league has to answer one basic question: which teams were better this season? Most professional leagues answer it by letting results on the field decide, through balanced schedules, heavy game volume, or fixed rules that turn … Continue reading →

Posted in Musings, Sports | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Closing the Distance: Artists’ Songs About Their Working Lives and the Audiences Who Prefer Not to Hear Them

Executive Summary Popular musicians regularly write songs about the conditions of their work: the isolation of touring, the strangeness of hotel life, the transactional side of performance, and the unequal intimacy between performers and fans. Artists often treat these songs … Continue reading →

Posted in History, Music History, Musings | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Reading the Map for the Market: Distinguishing Resident-Serving from Visitor-Serving Businesses: A White Paper on Commercial Geography, with Reference to St. John’s, Newfoundland

1. The Observation and a Needed Refinement A drive of about four miles along a commercial arterial into St. John’s shows a clear sequence. Residences come first, then a long run of car dealerships and auto-related businesses, and finally a … Continue reading →

Posted in Musings | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Paying for the Whole Career: A Framework for Just Compensation Across the Arc of Performance

Abstract Professional sports contracts routinely misalign pay with production. Players are often paid least during the years they may produce the most, because rookie scales, reserve rules, and restricted free agency cap their earnings. They are often paid most in … Continue reading →

Posted in Bible, Christianity, History, Sports | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Recommendations for Courts, Laboratories, and Legislatures

Abstract The five preceding papers in this series described the structure of foundation testimony, the distinction between corroboration and sequence, the fit between the testimonial line and the risks it addresses, the institutional costs of confrontation, and the gap between … Continue reading →

Posted in Musings | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Invisible Witnesses: Public Understanding of Trial Foundation

Abstract Most of the witnesses who lay the foundation for forensic evidence are seen by almost no one outside the courtroom. News reports mention the result and the expert who explained it. Documentaries and podcasts compress weeks of testimony into … Continue reading →

Posted in Musings | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Institutional Cost of Confrontation

Abstract The requirement that forensic analysts testify in person imposes costs on laboratories, courts, prosecutors, defense counsel, and defendants. Analysts spend time away from the bench; trials are scheduled around their availability; departures and retirements create gaps that the law … Continue reading →

Posted in Musings | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Purpose, Not Reliability? Examining the Testimonial Line

Abstract Under current Confrontation Clause doctrine, whether a forensic analyst must testify depends on whether the analyst’s report is testimonial, and whether a report is testimonial depends chiefly on the purpose for which it was made. A laboratory report prepared … Continue reading →

Posted in Musings | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Corroboration Versus Sequence: Witness Multiplicity as Appearance and Reality

Abstract A long witness list suggests to jurors and observers that a fact has been confirmed many times over. That suggestion is often mistaken. This paper distinguishes two structures in which multiple witnesses appear at trial. In corroboration, several witnesses … Continue reading →

Posted in Musings | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Foundation Load: A Typology of Evidence by Testimonial Burden

Abstract Criminal trials vary widely in the number of witnesses required to bring a single forensic result before a jury. A DNA comparison may require a procession of collectors, custodians, technicians, and analysts, while a set of cell phone records … Continue reading →

Posted in Musings | Tagged , , | Leave a comment