Book Review: The Atheist Who Didn’t Exist

The Atheist Who Didn’t Exist, Or: the Dreadful Consequences of Bad Arguments, by Andy Bannister

[Note: This book was provided free of charge by Kregel Book Tours in exchange for an honest review.]

As someone who reads a fair amount of books on the subject of apologetics, many of which deal with the challenge of the so-called “New Atheists” [1], it is always noteworthy to see a book that combines intellectual rigor with a great deal of humor. To be sure, the author is a confirmed Brit, with a lot of inside jokes that work best if one is fond of contemporary English culture, geography (particularly the Lake District, where I spent one memorable summer camp as a teenager), and food, along with a taste for literally hundreds of terrible puns on just about every page, many of them in footnotes. Even if one does not understand all of the puns and inside jokes in this book, a reader should be aware of the fact that the author has a breezy wit and clearly does not take himself seriously, poking fun at his amorous escapades as a youth, showing a great deal of appreciation to his longsuffering wife for their happy marriage, and using his wit to make the subject of philosophy something other than the stuffy subject it often seems to readers. Hopefully, while the readers are trying to figure out the latest joke that the author makes about food or cricket or some absurd story about a thief drugging people to help him steal art or a man who angrily denies the existence of Sweden while listening to ABBA tunes, they realize this joking is in service of strong philosophical ideals, namely the holding of those who consider themselves as the bright defenders of reason to the standards of reason they so cavalierly disregard in their own bloated rhetoric.

In terms of this organization, this book has a simple style that, like some of my own blog entries [2], makes gentle fun of 19th century writings and their overly complicated but also very descriptive titles, something that ought to be clear from the lengthy title of this book. Each chapter, usually around 20 pages, takes arrogant atheists to task about some major logical fallacy they adopt in their books and twitter posts and articles, which are given oddball titles that provide an over-the-top example, and which are helpfully described in the more mundane and explanatory subtitles. These logical fallacies include a look at the consequences of bad arguments, why atheism is a belief system, why all gods aren’t the same, why faith in God is not a sign of insanity, why psychological arguments against Christianity fail, why religion doesn’t poison everything, why science is incomplete in explaining the fullness of reality, why we need God to be good, why life without God is meaningless, why everyone has faith, and why we can really know a lot about Jesus Christ. The writer is a thoroughgoing Hellenistic Christian with a strong belief in the importance of rationality and while this book is short on a great deal of scriptural exegesis, it certainly provides a strong defense of the historicity of the Gospels on account of their genre as well as their awkward honesty, an argument that applies in general to the truth value of that which is written by people with tendencies towards awkward honesty that ought to be widely appreciated.

Although this book will be greatly lauded for its stylistic excellence, and for its consistent tone of irony and gentle ego-deflating mocking, the book really succeeds in terms of its consistent and logical rigor, and its submission of truth claims to a fair-minded and rigorous view of evidence. This book makes one example of Christian apologetics that shows defenders of belief to be deeply interested in rationality and truth, and in pointing out that the acidic bath of skepticism destroys the claims of many skeptics to being defenders of reason and intellect. In drawing out the many implications of the bad arguments of the New Atheists, the author manages to point out that their contemporary popularity is largely due to the fact that our present age is bored with the difficulty of thinking seriously and wants any excuse to justify its rejection of the high ethical demands of God’s ways as described in the Bible. This is a prescient argument, even if this book is not focused at our contemporary social trends. The one false note the book strikes is its continual ad hominem attacks at fundamentalists, a term it does not define and uses as a pejorative label. Given the attention the book takes to avoiding ad hominem attacks and defining terms carefully, this is a worrisome note that is probably made in order to appeal to its target audience of hip and ironic believers and skeptics who think themselves to be smarter than the fundamentalists they all openly disdain, presumably for believing the Bible is literal and for having a certainty in certain biblical truths as well as a general belief in inerrancy.

[1] See, for example:

https://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com/2013/03/04/book-review-gods-not-dead/

https://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com/2013/03/11/book-review-reasons-for-belief/

https://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com/2010/11/29/book-review-and-musing-on-the-foundations-of-christian-scholarship/

https://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com/2013/03/11/book-review-reasons-for-belief/

https://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com/2014/03/01/book-review-if-i-had-lunch-with-c-s-lewis/

https://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com/2014/03/01/book-review-true-reason/

[2] See, for example:

https://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com/2014/01/09/the-accidental-traveling-librarian-or-the-material-culture-of-nomads/

https://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com/2015/07/06/being-a-true-and-faithful-account-of-the-battle-of-filbert-grove/

About nathanalbright

I'm a person with diverse interests who loves to read. If you want to know something about me, just ask.
This entry was posted in Biblical History, Book Reviews, Christianity, History and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Book Review: The Atheist Who Didn’t Exist

  1. kwake says:

    I recently read How To Read the Bible by Harvey Cox. He’s a highly respected theologian but I couldn’t finish the book when he noted a theological and archeological discrepancy in the book of Genesis and sided with the archeologists. I realized then that I am a fundamentalist in every sense of the word. I’m OK with that.

  2. Pingback: Book Review: The God You Thought You Knew | Edge Induced Cohesion

  3. Pingback: Book Review: Jesus Called, He Wants His Church Back | Edge Induced Cohesion

  4. Pingback: Book Review: Reasons To Believe | Edge Induced Cohesion

  5. Pingback: Book Review: Man, Myth, Messiah | Edge Induced Cohesion

  6. Pingback: Book Review: A Search For Truth | Edge Induced Cohesion

  7. Pingback: Book Review: Believe | Edge Induced Cohesion

  8. Pingback: Book Review: Is The Bible True? | Edge Induced Cohesion

  9. Pingback: Book Review: What If Jesus Had Never Been Born? | Edge Induced Cohesion

  10. Pingback: Book Review: Everything You Wanted To Know About God But Were Afraid To Ask | Edge Induced Cohesion

  11. Pingback: Book Review: A Refutation Of Moral Relativism | Edge Induced Cohesion

  12. Pingback: Book Review: Letters To An Atheist | Edge Induced Cohesion

  13. Pingback: Book Review: The Case For Jesus | Edge Induced Cohesion

  14. Pingback: Book Review: C.S. Lewis’ Case For Christ | Edge Induced Cohesion

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s