Book Review: God, Science, And Reason

God, Science, And Reason, by Michael Bunner

[Note: This book was provided for free by Author Blog Tours, in exchange for an honest review.]

It is unclear exactly what audience that Michael Bunner is aiming for with this lengthy book. God, Science, And Reason consists of four books in one that together take up nearly 400 pages including notes. The first of these books is written to and for skeptics, honest searchers for truth who appear to be equally turned off both by “dogmatic Christians” and rabidly irrational atheists. The second of these books is written for those rabidly irrational atheists. The third book, by far the shortest, is written for “dogmatic Christians,” which the author defines as Young-Earth Creationists, blaming them for making Christians appear to be ignorant and anti-science. The fourth book is written as a general defense of mind-body dualism and of miracles as a demonstration of spiritual truth through physical acts.

I say that it is unclear what audience that Michael Bunner is aiming for becuase this book is not likely to attract members of either of the three audiences which receive specific targeted mini-books. Mind-body dualism is not likely to attract an honest skeptic to either the claims of the neo-Darwinian synthesis and the bogus philosophical claims that underly their irrational and inconsistent worldview (such readers are likely to appreciate intelligent design books from people like Denton and Behe and Dembski and others like them far more). Likewise, it is likely to receive nothing but derision from thin-skinned atheists who are not likely to appreciate having their worldview punctured so brutally honestly. Also, young-earth creationists are not likely to appreciate being taken to task by someone equally as dogmatic as they are, but simply from a different camp within the Creationist community. Even people (like myself) who could be thought to be in broad agreement with the author as Chrisitan intellectuals of an “Old Earth” Creationist mentality are likely to find much to criticize. For example, the author’s facile assumption of the “logical” nature of the Trinity struck this reader as being particularly illogical and irrational, but I expected nothing less.

Unless a reader particularly enjoys being insulted or reading intelligent and witty but sharp barbs directed at others, it is likely only the fourth and final section of this book that is likely to be of interest. As the first three parts of the book are written in the second person, making its sharp language seem even more heated and personal, it is likely that few readers will endure to the end and appreciate the best part of what this book has to offer. Those who do endure to the end will read an intriguing analysis of miracles, along with a very scholarly and insightful appreciation of the symbolism of Gospel passages and their Hebrew antecedents. The author has shown himself to be immensely well-read in polls of young Millennials in their late teens and twenties, the incoherent and inconsistent works of New Atheists who use their free will to denounce free will and show their high regard for reason and logic by their belief and practice of irrationality and illogic, and the works of Young Earth Creationists who desperately try to marry a particular interpretation of the Bible with a particular view of Creation Science that makes God out to be a somewhat deceptive being giving the appearance of great age for a universe that is apparently so young. As might be expected, none of the three audiences come off looking particularly well, but in the meantime, the author himself is shown to be a bit mean spirited and guilty of a fair bit of intellectual arrogance, which is something that never comes off well in text (I should know!). That approach and tone outweigh the author’s considerable knowledge and expertise in dealing with matters of philosophy.

It is unfortunate that I have to give this book such a mixed review, as I had high hopes entering into the book. That said, perhaps it might be good for the author to seek to have the last part of the book published as a smaller and standalone pamphlet, where it might come off far better without the distractions as being part of a work that seems to be largely absent the grace and love of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, whom the author claims to follow. The last section appears vastly more gracious and deserves a fair hearing without readers being insulted for the previous 300 pages, and that might require some follow-up work by the author. However, in looking at the book as it is, one can say that it is witty, it is certainly combative and part of the larger cultural debate, but that it is likely to please few people, unless the reader shares the author’s love of combative prose and the author’s very strong and dogmatic worldview.

About nathanalbright

I'm a person with diverse interests who loves to read. If you want to know something about me, just ask.
This entry was posted in Bible, Book Reviews, Christianity, History and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Book Review: God, Science, And Reason

  1. The following e-mail from a college freshman encountering Christian-bashing and atheism-promoting professors for the first time answers the question about who the target audience for this book really is:

    Subject: Something I thought I should share.

    Mr. Bunner,

    My Dad told me that your book is coming out soon, congratulations! I can’t wait to read the finished product. I also wanted to tell you what a blessing it was to be able to read your original manuscript. At the time I read it I had no idea how relevant it would be to my college life. I’ve never really debated religion, and I wasn’t aware of what atheists said about Christianity. I was comfortable in my bubble. Here at [college name withheld] I’ve heard more arguments against religion (especially Christianity) than for it. When I first started hearing arguments against Christianity I wasn’t really offended. Instead, I felt sad for those making the arguments. I didn’t think of your book right away, although what you wrote gradually came to mind. I just somehow couldn’t put everything together until today.

    I’m taking a World Religions class this semester (a better title would be Bash Christianity and Judaism for a Whole Semester.) My professor says they’re false because all other religions have the same story line, but then argues that other religions aren’t false because they follow that story line. He likes to make very bold statements and call Christians dumb, unenlightened, and stupid. I strongly feel that if I hadn’t read your book that by the end of this semester I could quite possibly be totally confused as to what I believe. At first, his arguments seem valid. He spouts off statistics that prove his point (without every mentioning a source). He’s demeaning and uses foul language to scare off people from actually asking questions (even though it’s a discussion based class.)

    I just wanted to take the time while I had it to thank you for allowing me to read your book while I was in high school. I had no idea how much it would help me in college. Although my religion class is almost unbearable to sit through, at least I know the truth.

    Thank you!

    [Name withheld]

    Even though Part 2 of my book is addressed to the New Atheists and Part 3 is addressed to Young-earth Christians, I have insufficient intellectual arrogance to believe that more than a few in either camp will ever read my book. They are too busy fighting with each other in order to sustain the myth that there is a war between science and religion. Instead, the real target audience for these two parts of my book is young adults. These chapters provide them with intellectual ammunition to counter what they hear from the atheists and creation scientists.

    The atheists argue that science disproves the truth of the Bible. Young-earth creationists argue that the Bible disproves the truth of modern, objective science. In my book, I argue that the truth of reality can only be grasped by those who interpret the observations of objective science through the philosophical lens of faith in God. In the worldview that I espouse, there is no war between science and religion. This worldview liberates both the mind and the spirit to know the truth, and allows the grace of God to raise those who embrace it to fullness of life.

    • Thanks for taking the time to provide a lengthy reply to my quesiton on your target audience. I’m glad that your book has found some very enthusiastic readers among college students who struggle with finding intellectually rigorous Christian works. I must admit that as someone who is well-read in science studies and apologetics that I found other apologetics works to be more powerful and other science books (especially with regards to Intelligent Design) to be more scientifically rigorous. If you write off those who are Young Earth Creationists (as well as militant unbelievers), then why bother to spend a substantial portion of your book insulting them? It would appear as if you are trying to conduct a wedge strategy to show that a scientifically rigorous and religiously orthodox view of science and philosophy can be found, but I must say I found your book to be a bit disappointing given my expectations, though I can see how some people might find it appealing in the absence of having a larger understanding of books on rational apologetics or intelligent design.

  2. Daniel Friedmann says:

    Thank-you for writing the subject-noted article about the new book “God, Science and Religion” by author Michael Bunner. I will be checking out the book.

    Perhaps you’d be interested in writing an article about the book “The Genesis One Code”. This book demonstrates that Genesis and science agree on timelines for the development of the universe and the appearance of life on earth. For more information please see

  3. Pingback: Book Review: Confident Faith | Edge Induced Cohesion

  4. Pingback: Book Review: Related By Chance, Family By Choice | Edge Induced Cohesion

  5. Pingback: Book Review: True Reason | Edge Induced Cohesion

  6. Pingback: Samizdat | Edge Induced Cohesion

  7. Pingback: Reasonable Doubt | Edge Induced Cohesion

  8. Pingback: Book Review: God?: A Debate Between A Christian And An Atheist | Edge Induced Cohesion

  9. Pingback: Book Review: Believe | Edge Induced Cohesion

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s