On The Difference Between Greek Thought and Hebrew Thought

What is the difference between Greek thought and Hebrew thought?  It would be most picturesque to picture a scene.  In one scene you are watching a group of people argue in black and white, elegantly splitting hairs, while in the other scene you see other people arguing in full vivid technicolor pulling at their beards and eating and talking excitedly.  A couple of years ago or so, I had the chance on a Sunday afternoon to hear a talk at a Messianic synagogue in the Palm Harbor area with some friends of mine.  I can’t remember the name of the speaker (who was very entertaining), but I do remember what he talked about, the difference between Greek and Hebrew ways of thinking.

Why does this matter?  If you are a student of the Bible, it matters a great deal.  It is the task of those who believe in and seek to follow the Bible to develop a biblical worldview.  That means seeing the world through the eyes of scripture and developing the character and mind and heart of God within us.  The question one has to answer is–what kind of mind does God have?  Does He think with Greek thought or Hebrew thought?

Hebrew Thought

Hebrew is the language of the law, the prophets, and the writings, the three divisions of the Hebrew scriptures.  The Hebrew scriptures themselves are predisposed to a certain sort of thinking that is not binary, not either/or.  In fact, the scribes and Pharisees, of whom Saul (Paul) of Tarsus was one, had at least four ways of interpreting the Bible, which they enshrined in a little mnemonic devise called Pardes, the word for garden (from where we get our “paradise”).  The P stands for Pshat (“simple”), the literal, straightforward meaning of the text of the Bible on which all else depends.  No further levels of interpretation can contradict the literal sense, but they can build upon it.  The R stands for Remez (“hint”), which is the implied meaning of scripture, where you build on the implications that scripture leaves believers to figure out for themselves but provides the clues for.  The D stands for Derush (“search”) which is the analogical or moralistic meaning of the Bible.  For example, when we take scripture (such as a prophecy or the Song of Solomon) and apply it to physical or spiritual Israel as a whole, we are engaging in this sort of interpretation.  Finally, the S stands for Sod (“secret”) the hidden level of interpretation.  The hidden nature is how something that seems simple and straightforward and pointless in scripture (for example, obscure laws and stories and genealogies) applies to us personally.

Now, it should be clear that you can go very far off the reservation with Hebrew thought.  See an example here [1]. You can become so entangled in hidden and secret meanings that you neglect the straightforward one (like the mystics do) or so intoxicated with the powers of your own intuition and know-how that you fail to appreciate the God in heaven who is the giver of all good gifts and the one who gets to make the rules (as tended to happen with the scribes and Pharisees of Jesus’ day, as can be seen if one reads the Talmud).

Nonetheless, despite these corruptions of Hebrew thought that one must be very careful to avoid, the essential nature of Hebrew thought in the Bible is to avoid painting an either/or dichotomy.  Is the Song of Solomon erotic love poetry celebrating proper sexuality within marriage?   Absolutely.  Is it about Israel and the Church as well?  Indeed it is.  Are the poor that the Messiah will care for and preach good tidings for in Isaiah 61:1 (quoted in Luke 4:18) physically poor or the spiritually poor (humble) in spirit?  Both.  It’s not an either/or thing.  Simply because a passage of the Bible applies to literal matters does not mean it does not apply to Israel or the Church or believers in their spiritual state.  The same prophecy can apply to the fall of Jerusalem in 586BC or 70AD or to the periodic rise and fall of the Church throughout history or the end times.  The Bible has a context that we must be very important to understand, but it is not limited to our narrow blinders about what we may think it means.  It can mean multiple things, which gives it richness and great applicability, assuming one knows how to handle it.

After all, the Bible includes two different accounts of the period of the monarchy of Israel (the Former Prophets from Joshua to 2 Kings and the writings of 1 and 2 Chronicles, Ezra, and Nehemiah, one written from the point of view of kings and the other from the point of view of priests, but both very valid perspectives).  Likewise, the Bible gives us four different accounts of the Gospel of Jesus Christ (which, intriguingly enough, seem to correspond with both the four levels of biblical interpretation explored above as well as the four different types of personalities–SJ’s, “guardians” or the audience of Jewish believers in Christ of Matthew’s account; SP’s, “artisans,” or the practical and pragmatic Romans of Mark’s account; NF’s, “idealists,” or the orderly account focusing on women and outcasts provided by Luke, or the NT’s “rational” account of the cosmic scope of the eternal battle between light and darkness provided by the fiercely intellectual but beloved apostle John.  Each approach has part of the whole story, but like the blind men trying to describe an elephant by feeling its tail, torso, leg, and snout, only a part.

Greek Thought

Having seen what Hebrew thought is like, with its layers of layers of possible meaning, let us examine Greek thought.  As can be expected, Greek thought is somewhat less rich in possibility than Hebrew thought, but considerably more precise.  I must admit that a certain part of me enjoys the precision of Greek philosophy, but not enough to prefer it to the richness of potential meaning provided by Hebrew thought.  As someone who tends to use words precisely but also intend a wide variety and applicability of meaning, I suppose I am someone who has dwelt in both realms of thought within my own life.  Greek thought is something that is nailed down, that means exactly and only one thing.

It should be noted that it is an open debate whether any part of the Bible was itself written in Greek originally or not.  It is not within the scope of this particular note (though it is something I would like to write about eventually), but there is an open question as to whether the original renewed covenant scriptures were originally written in Aramaic or Greek–and the Aramaic has a strong case that I believe is worthy of fuller investigation.  The sort of Greek thought that I am referring to is not that of the inspired authors of the renewed covenant scriptures, who were mostly all of Hebrew-thinking backgrounds (none were particularly conspicuously “Hellenistic”–Matthew, Mark, John, James, Jude, and Peter were all Jews, mostly Gallileans (except for Mark), Luke was apparently Syrian, and Paul was out of Tarsus but had apparently been trained by Gamaliel, certainly no friend to Hellenistic rationalism).  They tended to see the Bible in characteristically “Hebrew” ways, something that shows up even in the Greek.

Greek thought refers to the writings of Plato and Aristotle as well as their intellectual heirs the Gnostic heretics.  From Greek thought we have the whole dualistic heresies that try to pit everything into black/white or either/or thinking rather than recognizing the fuller balance.  Greek thinking pits the physical against the spiritual, leading either to asceticism where the tainted and dirty physical is punished while the enlightened spiritual is developed or to hedonism, where the corruption of one’s physical body through promiscuity or gluttony is unimportant because it is only the mind and spirit and not the body that matter anyway.  In Hebrew thought, the body, heart, mind, and spirit are all an interconnected whole, none of which can be neglected.

Despite our best intentions, it is too easy sometimes for Greek thought to slip in to our thinking habits when we are unprepared.  For example, we can seek to divide people into two camps–those who are enlightened or privileged and for whom the normal rules do not apply (Plato’s “Philosopher kings” or the ministerial elites of hierarchial organizations) and the great mass of humanity who are under bondage to tyrannical and oppressive leadership.  This sort of division of what is really one unified whole under the same godly standard is the perversion of biblical truth due to corrupt Greek thinking.  Likewise, it is Greek thinking (rather than Hebrew thinking) that worships youth and beauty and the sensual appetites, giving these sinful lusts a carnal, philosophical justification that only applies to privileged sinners in positions of high authority and not to the unprivileged masses.

Biblical Contrasts Between Greek and Hebrew Thought

Let us examine two contrasts set in the Bible between Greek and Hebrew thought, one which serves to favor Hebrew thought and the other which condemns the negative aspects of both types of thinking.  First, let us go to Matthew 20:25-28:  “But Jesus called them to Himself and said, “You know that the [Hellenistic] rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and those who are great exercise authority over them.  Yet it shall not be so among you; but whoever desires to become great among you, let him be your servant.  And whoever desires to be first among you, let him be your slave–just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many.”  We see here the egalitarian mindset of Hebrew thought favorably compared to the authoritarian bent of Greek thought that predominates the cultures of the heathen.

The second example points to the negative tendencies in the humanistic variants of both Jewish and Greek thought that we all must guard ourselves against, since it is pristine biblical culture and not the corrupted traditions of either Jews or Greeks, that we wish to adopt, as is stated in 1 Corinthians 1:22-25:  “For Jews request a sign, and Greeks seek after wisdom; but we preach Christ crucified, to the Jews a stumbling block and to the Greeks foolishness, but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.  Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.”  Here we see that humanly speaking Jews want a sign (some sort of mystical, miraculous proof showing Messiah as King delivering the Jews from foreign bondage, without seeking deliverance from the sin which enslaved them) while Greeks seek after wisdom (a logical proof that engages them intellectually, without seeking to challenge their entire way of living and behaving), but God provides something that serves as a barrier to the corrupted, sin-led listeners of any cultural background.  God desired to create a renewed biblical culture, requiring the sacrifice of His son Jesus Christ to open the path to His throne so that all could come before Him as His very own offspring.


Hopefully this particular exercise has been useful in distinguishing between Hebrew and Greek thought.  In seeking to build and adopt a biblical culture, let us avoid adopting the corrupted vestiges of Hebrew thought as they survive in mystical traditions or the Talmud, but let us adopt a biblical culture that allows the richness of applicability and interpretation with the common standard and equal standing of all before God that the Bible preaches so eloquently and forcefully.  Let us cast off the heretical hierarchies of the heathen and serve God in spirit and in truth, preparing for our noble calling as kings and priests in His kingdom, both now and forevermore.  Let us be true children of God, speaking His language and thinking His thoughts, and following His ways as we are guided by His Spirit within us, joining us together with all of our other brethren wherever they may be in space and time, sharing the expectation of rising up with eternal life upon the return of our elder brother, Jesus Christ.

[1] http://www.betemunah.org/sod.html

About nathanalbright

I'm a person with diverse interests who loves to read. If you want to know something about me, just ask.
This entry was posted in Bible, Christianity, Church of God, Musings and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

50 Responses to On The Difference Between Greek Thought and Hebrew Thought

  1. Pingback: The Truths of Muthos and Logos In Scripture: Part One | Edge Induced Cohesion

  2. Bridget says:

    Thank you for this highly informative article. I learned a lot from reading it.

  3. Pingback: Edge Induced Cohesion: 2012 In Review (Version Two) | Edge Induced Cohesion

  4. Pingback: When Greek Minds Try To Understand Hebrew Texts | Edge Induced Cohesion

  5. Pingback: A Virgin Shall Conceive | Edge Induced Cohesion

  6. Pingback: Book Review: Christians, Remember Your Past Lives: Learn How | Edge Induced Cohesion

  7. Pingback: A Crisis Of Gratitude: On The Confluence Of Hanukkah, Thanksgiving, and Predatory Commercialism | Edge Induced Cohesion

  8. Pingback: Book Review: The Passion Of The Western Mind | Edge Induced Cohesion

  9. Keith says:

    Thanks for this! I too learned a lot and it coincides with what I’ve read in the bible in the past. I never tried to learn more, this definitely helped.

  10. Pingback: Edge Induced Cohesion: 2013 In Review (Part Two) | Edge Induced Cohesion

  11. Pingback: In Vulcan’s Forge | Edge Induced Cohesion

  12. Pingback: My thoughts on Hebrew vs Greek thinking, what are yours? - Christian Chat Rooms & Forums

  13. Crystal says:

    and this is to say we do as Jesus did/would? correct?

  14. Pingback: More Than Words | Edge Induced Cohesion

  15. Pingback: No Line On The Horizon | Edge Induced Cohesion

  16. Pingback: Edge Induced Cohesion: 2015 In Review (Part Two) | Edge Induced Cohesion

  17. Pingback: Book Review: The Parthenon Code: Mankind’s History In Marble | Edge Induced Cohesion

  18. Victor says:

    Hebrew thought is poetry. The Bibls is a beautiful persuasive poem, but not reality of course. It is the Greeks who pulled humans from under the Gods by cutting the gods down to size. This liberation allowed the Greeks to create adult humans, not subservient to any one.

    This gave them the strength to apply humao reason to everything and allowed them to think creatively about anything; art, literature, sculpture, the human mind, the human body, architecture, astronomy, math, geometry, engineering, philosophy and, of course, democracy, the democracy modern day Israel has surrendered too eve if it does not quite get the hang of it like the English and few others do.

    The modern World, World civilisation is the continuation of Greek civilisation held back when the masses found more comforting the Christian copy of the Jewish God with its comforting revelation in Sinai (no need to figure out the World and human nature, god provides all the answers, no need to worry, just have faith-follow the law).

    Greek thought was too much for most, including the Jews. The Jewish Torah is a nice literary piece but defies reason.

    The clock stopped when Christianity-Judaism prevailed, not the first time the worse idea prevails.

    But humanity eventuall caught up with Greek thought. The Moslem came across Greek ideas, they toyed with them for a while but eventually they scared them.

    Finally, in the Renaissance Greek ideas, Greek Reason, human dignity, human self esteem prevailed and Galileo put the first nail in the coffin and many more have beed added. Religious people basically worship a dead idea.

    Most Jews do not belong in god. They are still Jews culturally and I do not blame them because the Jewish emphasis on hard work, think outside the box, have enabled many Jews to achieve great things but they are Greek Jews. With Judaism they would never do that. This is why ancient Israel was basically priest, merchant and peasant land, no freedom to think and do.

    Of course, the whole West is different shades of Greek thought. Moslems are behind they pushed away Greek thought. They are still scared. That is why they have unbelievable economic, social and political backwardness and ISIS.

    Even the clever Chinese ant Japanese and the rest of the World are becoming Greek.

  19. Pingback: The Number Seventy-Two | Edge Induced Cohesion

  20. Pingback: Pardes | Edge Induced Cohesion

  21. Pingback: Book Review: Song of Solomon Revealed | Edge Induced Cohesion

  22. Pingback: Book Review: Paganism Surviving In Christianity | Edge Induced Cohesion

  23. George Papageorgakis says:

    From what I read you probably have no clue what Greek Philosophy and Culture means…

    “Greek thinking (rather than Hebrew thinking) that worships youth and beauty and the sensual appetites, giving these sinful lusts a carnal, philosophical justification that only applies to privileged sinners in positions of high authority and not to the unprivileged masses.”
    Worst fallacious argument ever heard in the internet…

    Let me remind you that the Greeks cared for the unpriviledged. Thats why they did not build castles and towers like the medival european monkeys. Everything was for public use, from theaters to school and academies. Although not perfect, they at least teached us about human equality and human rights, you know… democracy etc…

    There was never such a thing as “Jewish philosophy” but only “Jewish Theology-Cosmology”…
    Philosophy is based on reason and not on theological dogmatism…
    In sort, regarding theology-cosmology, Greeks can be said that were more of “agnostics” while Jews could justify everything with a “god’s will” quote…

    From philosophical point of view, monotheistic theology is more malevolent as it promotes concetration of power and knowledge while discrediting any notion of equality and free thought. Thats why Greek philosophy-theology-cosmology has inspired many people and helped humanity overcome the grudge of “godly predeterminism”… While every other world view back then was mostly promoting after life and fantasies the Greek way of thinking introduced a more logical and harmonic way of daily life…

    In addition, Jews were mostly benefited by Greek culture and civilization than the other way around… Do not forget that Talmud and Torah were translated Greek, for the first time to a “non-jewish” language! And when the Greeks tried to embrace jewish theology, aka christianity, medival age was introduced… and whatever that means… the age of backwardness…

    • Clearly you have not read enough about my writing. It was the Christians whose care for the unprivileged made them legendary in the midst of the cruel Greco-Roman civilization of the age. Also, your hostility towards biblical thought merely proves my point–it is noble that you wish to defend the honor of your ancestors, but regrettable that it should be such a fallacious defense.

  24. Pingback: Hmmm…. | Edge Induced Cohesion

  25. Pingback: Book Review: The Grammar Of God | Edge Induced Cohesion

  26. Pingback: The Providence Of A Friendly Author | Edge Induced Cohesion

  27. Pingback: Book Review: Song Of Songs | Edge Induced Cohesion

  28. Pingback: Book Review: Discipleship Journal’s Best Bible Study Methods | Edge Induced Cohesion

  29. Pingback: Book Review: Amen! Hallelujah! Insights Into The Book Of Revelation | Edge Induced Cohesion

  30. mstair says:

    Excellent article! Briefly, the Jewish tradition termed moreal/spiritual failure as sin and cited the Law which insisted it must be atoned for through offered sacrifice. Greek thought’s dualistic view of spirit versus matter taught that one’s spirit could live a pure sinless life while one’s physical body was allowed to satisfy its base appetites. ”

    Excerpt From: Mike Stair. “The World’s Favorite Bible Verses.” MS Peabooks, 2013. iBooks. https://itun.es/us/8lbRJ.l

  31. Pingback: Bible: Two Proofs And Two Mis-Translations | Edge Induced Cohesion

  32. Pingback: Book Review: Exploring Our Hebraic Heritage | Edge Induced Cohesion

  33. Pingback: A Cure For Itching Ears | Edge Induced Cohesion

  34. Don Vena says:

    I was hoping to resolve the conflict between the two swords in Luke 22:36 by harmonizing the passage through the use of non-dualism

  35. Don Vena says:

    I was hoping by understanding Hebrew thinking as being nondualistic will help me resolve the conflict between the two swords in Luke 22:36

  36. Pingback: Remez: Knowing The Text So We Can Play | Edge Induced Cohesion

  37. Pingback: Audiobook Review: Great Courses: Religion In The Ancient Mediterranean World: Part 3 | Edge Induced Cohesion

  38. Pingback: Book Review: Beyond The Hebrew Lexicon | Edge Induced Cohesion

  39. Pingback: Book Review: The Father Of Us All | Edge Induced Cohesion

  40. Pilgrim Bobby says:

    Great article and interesting comments. The Greek mindset seems determined to give preeminence to the intellect and, because of that, fast-forwarded humanistic endeavours greatly. Certainly, the Jews learned a lot from the Greeks. They, themselves, will attest to that. But the Jews, like all of us, have a penchant also to absorb the bad with the good. While incredibly advanced intellectually, classical Greece had some underlying rot, not least of which Plato railed against. Platonism, at its core, may also have something to answer for. The Hebrew mindset, as you say, is different. It is holistic in its perception, not atomistic. It is spiritually driven not driven by the intellect. That’s not to say Jews are not smart. Not by any means. They are possibly the smartest “race” on earth. But they know to temper smarts. The Greeks were a great civilisation, progressed quickly, but the smarts got the better of them. It’s not about smart. Smart is part of it but its not the be all and end all. It’s not the driving force. It’s not the determining factor. The driving force is Spirit. The right guide is Torah. The Jews learned a lot from the Greek. Perhaps the Greek could have learned more from the Jew. The Greek is convinced he is right because he is an animal of the intellect. The Jew trusts he is right because he is an animal of the spirit. (And that’s from someone of Greek extraction). The Greek is a very visual animal, and an animal of the senses. The Jew is suspicious of images, an animal of the spirit. I love both cultures but, as we drive headlong through this apocalypse, I’m more contented by having been born again and grafted into Israel than by any Greek intellectual heritage. The Greeks are great, but its the Hebrew mindset that God desires. That comes with having the Torah written in your heart. The golden age of Greece came and went. Meanwhile, the Jews keep on keeping on.

    • I agree with you, and those are my sentiments as well. This is not to say that the Jews themselves were not influenced by the Greek mindset (witness the intellectualism of the Talmudic tradition), but that we need to temper our intellect with a realization of the spirit and the whole rather than a spirit that tries to reduce everything to that which can be conceived by ourselves.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s