White Paper: Between Identities: The Insecurity and Anxiety of Transitioning from One Identity to Another

Executive Summary

Identity is not a static possession but an evolving construct shaped by personal experiences, social roles, and cultural recognition. Transitions between identities—whether in terms of class, profession, nationality, culture, or other defining aspects—often bring a profound sense of instability. The individual finds themselves between established categories, no longer fully belonging to the old group, but not yet fully integrated into the new. This liminal state can generate heightened insecurity, anxiety, and self-consciousness, as the internal sense of self struggles to match external recognition. This paper examines the psychological, sociological, and cultural dimensions of “in-between” identity states, highlighting their challenges and adaptive possibilities.

1. Introduction

Humans anchor their self-concept in stable markers—shared values, familiar communities, recognizable social roles. When a person moves from one identity to another, these anchors loosen. For a period, the person lives in what anthropologists call a liminal space: a threshold where the old has been shed but the new has not fully formed. This experience, while sometimes a pathway to growth, can also be a source of alienation, anxiety, and deep insecurity.

2. The Nature of “In-Between” Identity

2.1 Defining Liminality

The term “liminal” comes from the Latin limen, meaning “threshold.” In identity terms, it describes the state of being between categories, often invisible or ambiguous to others. Examples include:

A migrant adapting to a new cultural identity but retaining habits from the old country. A professional changing industries or roles, with credentials respected in one field but not in another. An athlete shifting from competitive sports to coaching or administrative roles. A person moving from rural life to a metropolitan environment and navigating different social codes.

2.2 Internal and External Identity Markers

Identity is validated both internally (how one sees oneself) and externally (how others categorize and treat the individual). In transitional states, internal self-definition may outpace or lag behind external recognition, creating cognitive and emotional dissonance.

3. Psychological Impact

3.1 Insecurity and Imposter Syndrome

A person between identities often feels like an outsider in both worlds. They may perceive themselves as “faking” the new identity while also betraying or abandoning the old. This fosters a form of imposter syndrome that is not merely about competence but about belonging itself.

3.2 Anxiety and Hypervigilance

Because belonging is precarious, individuals may become overly sensitive to cues from others—scanning for signs of acceptance or rejection. This hypervigilance can lead to social exhaustion and reinforce a sense of isolation.

3.3 Loss of Narrative Continuity

People understand themselves through coherent life stories. Transitional identity periods can disrupt these narratives, creating uncertainty about the self’s past, present, and future coherence.

4. Sociocultural Dimensions

4.1 Gatekeeping and Boundary Policing

Communities often enforce boundaries to preserve their integrity. When a person transitions into or out of a group, they may encounter gatekeepers who question their authenticity—whether overtly (“You’re not really one of us”) or subtly (through exclusion from key networks).

4.2 Cultural Codes and Hidden Knowledge

Full membership in a group often requires mastery of implicit cultural codes—speech patterns, dress, humor, etiquette. During transition, individuals may misstep, revealing their “outsider” origins and triggering feelings of embarrassment or shame.

4.3 Class and Social Mobility

In upward or downward class mobility, the “in-between” individual may feel estranged from both their origin and destination groups, experiencing a split habitus—a concept from Pierre Bourdieu describing the mismatch between ingrained dispositions and new social contexts.

5. Case Studies and Illustrations

Professional Shift: A mid-career soldier moving into corporate management carries authority and decisiveness, but struggles with corporate jargon and unspoken office politics, feeling both overqualified and underprepared. Cultural Migration: A first-generation immigrant’s children adopt local culture faster than the parent, leaving the parent feeling stranded between homeland traditions and the host culture’s expectations. Urban to Rural Transition: A city professional relocates to a rural area seeking quality of life, but finds it difficult to navigate slower social rhythms and different measures of status.

6. Coping Mechanisms and Adaptive Strategies

6.1 Building Transitional Communities

Connecting with others in similar liminal states—whether through support groups, alumni networks, or informal friendships—can provide validation and mutual understanding.

6.2 Accepting Multiplicity

Rather than seeing identity as a zero-sum transfer from old to new, embracing a plural or hybrid identity can reduce anxiety. This involves acknowledging that parts of the old self remain valuable and legitimate.

6.3 Reframing the Narrative

Developing a coherent personal story that integrates both past and future identities can help stabilize self-concept. This might involve seeing the transition as an expansion of self rather than a loss.

6.4 Mindfulness and Self-Compassion

Recognizing that insecurity is a normal response to liminality can defuse self-criticism. Mindfulness practices can help individuals observe their anxieties without being overwhelmed by them.

7. Implications for Institutions and Society

Employers should recognize the integration curve for new hires from different professional backgrounds, providing mentorship and cultural onboarding. Civic and cultural organizations should adopt inclusive practices for newcomers, acknowledging the challenges involved in crossing identity boundaries. Educational institutions should prepare students for transitional phases, especially those involving first-generation college experiences or international exchanges.

8. Conclusion

The insecurity and anxiety of being between identities is not a sign of weakness but a predictable human response to the loss of belonging and the uncertainty of redefinition. While liminal states can be destabilizing, they also hold the potential for creativity, empathy, and personal growth. By understanding and supporting people in these transitional spaces, both individuals and communities can turn identity change from a site of fear into a source of resilience.

Unknown's avatar

About nathanalbright

I'm a person with diverse interests who loves to read. If you want to know something about me, just ask.
This entry was posted in Musings and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to White Paper: Between Identities: The Insecurity and Anxiety of Transitioning from One Identity to Another

  1. People “transitioning” out of Armstrongism often find themselves moving to an opposite extreme. Armstrongist culture is inherently uber-binary, meaning that any change all off and produce “ditch jumping.” An example would include the WCG family once considered very adherent to the faith stopping at a grocery store on the way home from services on January 7, 1995 to purchase Virginia ham. Another would be the theoretical example of the single male Armstrongist who, upon reading my brilliant reputation of traditional Armstrongist eschewance of Civic Duty, immediately goes out purchases two 9-mills and an AR, with five hicaps and 1000 rounds per. (In my case, I started with just one 9-mill.)

    This, I believe, goes far to explaining why so many who leave that faith tradition go liberal religiously. (There is also the “jerk the steering wheel” factor of major change being necessary to break the spirito-psychological hold.) Few go mainstream Protestant. They either find another fringy group, or they mellow out a lot when it comes to religion. This is especially true with those raised in the tradition. For most of them, Armstrongism is their only view of religion. So breaking from it very easily means breaking from religion. They are very disproportionately agnostic or atheist. Converts like myself, on the other hand, know “there is life out there.” We can envision serious faith without adherence to the ad man from Iowa. So while the phenomenon exists even with people like me, it tends to be a little less pronounced. 

    The same phenomenon exists in political positioning. Those raised in Armstrongism well usually tend to be very liberal politically, despite — or perhaps, because of — being in an environment in which if people did vote, they would probably vote Republican at near-Amish levels. This is much less the case with converts, as Armstrongist outreach directly targets conservatives, and so leaving Armstrongism will more just allow us to return to those roots.

    There are other factors, like religious burnout, discomfort with less-controlling religions, and (to the ad man’s credit) genuine demonstration of errors or imperfections and other churches. I can make a double entendre and say that “Armstrong ruined them for all of the churches,” but I won’t.

    One thing I would love to see is a survey of non-Armstrongist ministers who have received former Armstrongists into the congregations.  Issues to ask them about will be such as veneration of ministers, Sunday congregating (regardless of personal sabbatical practice), less doctrinal enforcement and dogmatism, embracing of civic duty, even the use of the term, “the C/church.” As I said, “there’s life out there,” but transitioning into it can be an interesting trip.

    So when you see people of your generation leave your faith tradition, don’t be surprised if they go liberal — at least for a while. It’s a bitter seed that was sown.

    Like

Leave a comment